Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled by a 6-3 margin (O'Connor, Rehnquist, and Thomas dissenting; Scalia writing a separate concurring opinion) that the federal laws prohibiting marijuana override any state laws that might permit its use.
I support the legality of medicinal use of marijuana. I support the legalization of recreational use of marijuana. I support the continued legal use of marijuana for religious purposes.
However, from my perusal of the actual text of the decision, I'm not sure that the Supreme Court was wrong. Read the decision itself, please. You can gloss over on the details of Blahblah v. Yadayada; the substance of the decision is that the states cannot carve out a limited exception to the federal drug classification. It is (as the majority of the Court goes out of its way to note) the responsibility of the Congress to recognize the silliness of calling marijuana a substance with no established medicinal use.
The dissenters held that it was within the rights of an individual state to permit medical marijuana within its own borders, provided that it did not extend into interstate commerce.
The Congress has classified marijuana as a Schedule I drug. That means that it has a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use, and no accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment.
High potential for abuse
It seems to me that the potential for abuse of a substance breaks down into the attractiveness of non-medical use, the dangers associated with non-medical use, and the risks of physical addictiveness and psychological habituation. Marijuana clearly rates high (no pun intended) on the first criterion. It's fun — kind of like getting drunk, only without the stumbling and puking and with a lot less hangover the next day.The dangers of non-medical use of marijuana vary depending on the frequency of use and the timeframe under consideration. In the long term, smoking marijuana (as well as smoking other things, such as tobacco) increases the risk of various ailments such as lung cancer. More on that issue later.... The THC in marijuana also appears to cause long-term effects such as decreased sperm motility and poor short-term
Marijuana certainly has an element of psychological dependence. On the other hand, another way of saying the same thing is that many people use marijuana as medication for certain psychological issues such as depression. (Such use remains controversial in medical and legal circles, but it is abundantly clear that many individual people consider it self-medication for depression.) On a physical level, though, marijuana is physically addictive. Yes, I said that marijuana is physically addictive. However, that's not the whole story. A friend of mine got his start on smoking pot at his parents' knees at the age of 4. He was a heavy user for 13 years before he quit cold-turkey at age 17. He experienced the textbook symptoms of withdrawal from tetrahydrocannabinol. Of all the marijuana users I have ever known, including some for whom sobriety was a brief break from near-perpetual stoner fog until they abruptly quit, I have never seen any other evidence of physical addiction to marijuana. Besides that, let's look at that issue in context — which carries greater risk of addiction: smoking a Marlboro while enjoying a whiskey and soda, or puffing on an unfiltered marijuana cigarette?
|